National Divorce
Lately, Republican politicians have been calling for a national divorce. This has led people to draw parallels to the Civil War (but the political parties reversed). We don’t need states to secede from the United States to have a union of free and independent states, we just need the Constitution to be the supreme law of the land. The USA need to declare independence from the British (Anglo-American) Empire, which coopted our government during the World Wars via the Military Industrial Complex.
Several Republicans, notably Marjorie Taylor Green, representative from Georgia to the 118th Congress of the United States of America, have called for a national divorce, because they are tired of being ruled by Democrats and their co-religionists. The Democrats are calling them racist, and are making comparisons to the Civil War.[1][2]
We don’t need states to secede from the United States to have a union of free and independent states, we just need the Constitution to be the supreme law of the land. That will happen when we default on our debt or inflate it away, and the Democrats and RINOs running the country can’t pay enough cops, judges, and politicians to enforce their Byzantine laws. Either the government will have no money or it will be worthless. The Constitution was adopted during a time of historic debt, historic inflation, and insurrections.[3]
However, we do need to declare independence from the British (Anglo-American) Empire again.
The USA joined the British (Anglo-American) Empire during the World Wars, also known as the Second Thirty Years War (1618-1648 vs 1914-1945), via the Military Industrial Complex. It solidified the USA’s modern two party system, where the Socialists were wedded to the imperialists under FDR’s two party system. While it is generally a Western European Empire, it has been under the umbrella of leaders who are culturally British, speak English, and have a world empire. The empire is currently based upon the petro-dollar.
While the British Empire may no longer directly rule India (1858-1947), or directly control the Suez (1875-1956) and Panama Canals (USA 1914-1999), they still control much of the world’s finances through their tax havens, such as the Cayman Islands, the British Virgin Islands, and the City of London; and, also, their puppet states of Saudi Arabia and Israel. They still have influence in their former colonies of Singapore (Straights of Malaca), Hong Kong, and New York City.[4]
The USA joined the British Empire via the Military Industrial Complex (MIC). The MIC is a group of people who profit from wars, beginning with the USA arming the European Empires, particularly Britain, during the two World Wars (1914-1918 and 1939-1945).
The USA also armed the Soviet Union during WWII. After WWII, the MIC continued to profit by fighting communism (Soviet Union/Russia). They transitioned into fighting Al-Qaeda terrorists (created by the USA to fight the Soviet Union) after the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991. Now they are fighting the Russians in Ukraine. They arm both sides for profit and to justify their military intervention in Europe (NATO) and around the world.
The term Military Industrial Complex was first coined by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in his January 17, 1961 farewell address. Eisenhower was also the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe during WWII. He said,[5]
“Now this conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet, we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources, and livelihood are all involved. So is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.”
Later that same year, President John F. Kennedy said to the American newspaper Publishers Association, on April 27,[6]
“For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.”
President Kennedy was referring to the Soviet Union and international socialists working together against the Republic. After his assassination in 1963, the warmongers of the Anglo-American Empire completed their multi-decade coup with American Socialists (controlled opposition) to replace the Republic with an empire with enough power to rule Americans. Hence, Democrats and RINOs have more in common with each other than with Republicans who won’t vote against the laws of the Republic (the Constitution).
The Vietnam War was expanded by President Johnson, who lost his election in 1968 to President Nixon, who defaulted on the gold standard in 1971 after being bankrupted by war and New Deal/Great Society social spending. Socialism isn’t radical in America. It is status quo.
The result was the creation of the petro-dollar, backed by oil and Saudi Arabian and American oil, in 1974.[7]
The Federal Reserve Note, commonly called the dollar, backed by gold and silver dollars, had initially became the world’s reserve currency after Britain and the USA won WWII. It was agreed upon at the 1944 Bretton Woods Conference. Combined with the financial power of New York City and the City of London, the British can buy the politicians of most oil producing countries.[8]
In fact, the British have been interested in controlling oil in the Middle East well before 1974. The British Empire helped arm and fund the Arab revolt against the Ottomans (Lawrence of Arabia) during the First World War (1914-1918) that resulted in the creation of Saudi Arabia in 1932. The government of Great Britain also agreed to start settling Jews in Palestine for a creation a their national homeland in the Balfour Agreement of 1917, which resulted in the state of Israel in 1948. These two countries serve as useful outposts in controlling the region.[9][10]
However, one example of blowback from this foreign policy was the creation of the Islamic Republic of Iran in 1979. The Islamic Republic of Iran was created in a revolution that overthrew the Shah of Iran. The Shah was put into power by a CIA and British backed coup against their democratically elected government in 1953.
Speaking of blowback, the petro-dollar and Anglo-American Empire may be ending as the US government prints money and goes deeper into debt. It will end when we default on our debt or inflate it away, and the Democrats and RINOs running the country can’t pay enough cops, judges, and politicians to enforce their Byzantine laws. Either the government will have no money or it will be worthless. Countries are wondering why they should use dollars for oil if the dollar is becoming worth less. Saudi Arabia is even looking to accepting the Chinese Yuan as payment. That would kill it too.[11]
Lately, Republican politicians have been calling for a national divorce. This has led people to draw parallels to the Civil War (but the political parties reversed). We don’t need states to secede from the United States to have a union of free and independent states, we just need the Constitution to be the supreme law of the land. The USA need to declare independence from the British (Anglo-American) Empire, which coopted our government during the World Wars via the Military Industrial Complex.
[3]https://www.hamiltonmobley.com/blog/due-process-government-by-default
[4]https://www.hamiltonmobley.com/blog/the-city-of-london
[5]https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/dwightdeisenhowerfarewell.html
[6]https://www.jfklibrary.org/archives/other-resources/john-f-kennedy-speeches/american-newspaper-publishers-association-19610427
[7]https://www.hamiltonmobley.com/blog/r9tu385c22azkxuycdia7o3kludljh
[8]https://www.hamiltonmobley.com/blog/r9tu385c22azkxuycdia7o3kludljh
[9]https://www.hamiltonmobley.com/blog/the-death-of-the-petro-dollar
[10]https://www.npr.org/2019/01/31/690363402/how-the-cia-overthrew-irans-democracy-in-four-days
[11]https://www.hamiltonmobley.com/blog/brics